RE: Windfall tax on those profiting from the war on Iran to tackle the cost of living crisis
-
Dear Prime Minister and Chancellor,
RE: Windfall tax on those profiting from the war on Iran to tackle the cost of living crisis
Across the UK, millions are barely staying afloat. Energy bills are bursting family budgets, childcare costs are washing away wages, businesses are struggling, and housing costs have skyrocketed. Many of the greatest problems people in the UK are facing right now will intensify as the impacts of the war on Iran continue to ripple through the economy.
The US-Israeli strikes on Iran as part of an illegal war, have caused chaos, killed civilians and have triggered the largest ever disruption to fuel supply, according to the International Energy Agency, sending crude oil costs surging over $100 per barrel in recent days. This has only worsened after the recent attacks on gasfields and LNG processing facilities in Iran and Qatar, which have caused gas prices to jump to four-year highs, with the impacts to be felt for many months and years to come.
Domestically, UK gas prices have more than doubled since late February. They are now at their highest since August 2022 and are likely to drive up energy bills unless action is taken to protect households and businesses when the next price cap is determined. Meanwhile, households are already grappling with the impacts of jumping fuel price increases, making simply getting by increasingly expensive. At the same time, experts are predicting major disruption to production and imports for agriculture inputs like fertilisers, risking further affordability issues for food and drink essentials in the months to come.
This crisis makes clear that the UK must end its reliance on fuels imported from overseas and invest in domestic renewable energy, to ensure British energy security is not left susceptible to global conflicts, disasters, or trade disputes. This will also help accelerate the UK’s transition toward a low-carbon economy, thereby reducing the likelihood of further economic shocks.
Sadly, there are some clear winners of the war on Iran. Oil and gas giants, big banks, agricultural input industries and defence companies will likely make record profits, at the expense of enormous human suffering. In recent crises, like those triggered by the Covid-19 pandemic and war in Ukraine, the wealthiest households and super-rich amassed even greater fortunes - to the tune of hundreds of billions of pounds, while millions were left struggling. Time after time, when wars break out, or major crises unfold, companies across different sectors, alongside super-rich individuals, make eye-watering sums of money. North Sea energy firms are set to make bumper profits. According to new data, for every month that energy prices remain at 18th March 2026 levels, profits could result in over £200m in tax revenue through the Energy Profits Levy. Banks reap profits due to the Bank of England’s misguided decision to raise interest rates in response to supply-side inflation. Higher rates are paid by borrowers - whose mortgage costs are already soaring off the back of the Iran crisis - and the Bank of England itself, which pays interest on the risk-free reserves banks hold with them. The latter cost is ultimately borne by the Treasury, currently to the tune of £20bn per year.
It is not right that extraordinary profits, generated off the backs of ordinary people during periods of crisis, are siphoned off into private hands and corporate bank accounts. All whilst households and businesses are in urgent need of substantial support to cope with the affordability crisis. The government’s own cost of living champion has called for measures to prevent profiteering. We urge you to make this crisis a turning point for the UK. Taking bold action to systemically reform our tax system and invest in our energy security will build resilience in our economy to
withstand future shocks and make life affordable for people and businesses in the UK.
We are writing to you today, as leading organisations from civil society, urging you to:
Ensure a permanent and strengthened energy profits mechanism which captures all excess profits made by oil and gas companies - including windfalls during crises - and close all loopholes which encourage further investment in harmful fossil fuels.
Introduce a levy on banks specifically targeting UK retail net income, profits they have made directly from the UK public.
Apply additional excess profits (windfall) taxes to companies in sectors profiteering from this crisis and the war in Iran, for example big agribusiness, the defence industry and associated AI and tech firms.
Invest revenue from excess profits into direct support to households and businesses to help weather the shock of the affordability crisis, alongside accelerating bringing online mass-scale low and zero carbon solutions to build a resilient energy system in the UK.
The billions in revenue from the additional proposed taxes on windfalls from this crisis must be reinvested into providing direct cost of living support and making our economy more resilient to withstand shocks in the future.
We can break free of the war-energy crisis doom loop, invest in renewables and low-carbon solutions, support people to deal with the cost of living crisis and put Britain on a path to better living standards for everyone in this country.
Yours sincerely,
Adrian Ramsay MP co-signed this letter along with Sian Berry MP, Carla Denyer MP, Hannah Spencer MP and Dr Ellie Chowns MP. Tax Justice UK, Faiza Shaheen, Executive Director
Greenpeace UK, Areeba Hamid, Co-Executive Director
Global Witness, Mike Davis, CEO
Women’s Budget Group, Dr Daniella Jenkins, Executive Director
National Education Union, Daniel Kebede, General Secretary38Degrees, Matthew McGregor, CEO
PCS Union, Fran Heathcote, General Secretary
Positive Money, Sara Hall, Co-Executive Director
End Fuel Poverty Coalition, Simon Francis, Coordinator
Global Justice Now, Nick Dearden, Executive Director
Autonomy Institute, Will Stronge, Chief Executive
Patriotic Millionaires UK, Rebecca Gowland, Executive Director
Green New Deal Rising
350.org, Anne Jellema, Executive Director
Zero Hour, Amy McDonnell and James Sutton, Co-Executive Directors
Care Full, Ruth Hannan & Hannah Webster, Co-Directors
Stamp Out Poverty, David Hillman, Director
War on Want, Liz McKean, Executive Director
Fairness Foundation, Will Snell, Chief Executive
Compass, Lena Swedlow, Deputy Director
Equality Trust, Priya Sahni-Nicholas and Jo Wittams; Co-Executive Directors
Taxpayers Against Poverty, Tom Burgess, CEO
Debt Justice, Heidi Chow, Executive Director
Fuel Poverty Action, Stuart Bretherton, Campaigns Lead
Mainstream
Women’s Environmental Network, Kate Metcalf, Co-Director
Voices Adfocad, Mike O'Brien, Founder
Tipping Point UK, Louise Hazan, Co-Director
Wellbeing Economy Alliance Scotland, Lisa Hough- Stewart, Interim Director
WEAll Global, Stewart Wallis, Executive Co Chair
Culture Unstained, Chris Garrard, Co-Director
Possible, Hirra Khan Adeogun & Juliet Michaelson, Co-directors
Cost of Living Action, Conor O'Shea, Campaign Coordinator Financial Transparency Coalition, Matti Kohonen, Executive Director
Conflict and Environment Observatory, Doug Weir, Director
JustMoney Movement, Sarah Edwards, Executive Director
Tipping Point North South, Deborah Burton. Co-founder
New Economics Foundation, Danny Sriskandarajah, Chief Executive
CLES (Centre for Local Economies), Dr Sarah Longlands
Oil Change International, Elizabeth Bast, Executive Director
Re: Government time to debate national security assessment on biodiversity loss, ecosystem collapse and national security
-
The Rt. Hon. Emma Reynolds MP
Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
23 March 2026
Re: Government time to debate national security assessment on biodiversity loss, ecosystem
collapse and national security
Dear Secretary of State,
Further to my letter of 3 February 2026, I write again about the Government’s national security
assessment’s stark warning that global biodiversity loss and ecosystem collapse pose a serious threat to
the United Kingdom’s security and prosperity.
Today, the United Nations warned that the planet is being ‘pushed beyond its limits’ as energy imbalance
reach record high and its Secretary-General António Guterres called on countries to "deliver climate
security, energy security and national security"
.
In this context, I would be grateful for an indication on when you will set a time to debate the Joint
Intelligence Committee’s report as indicated by the Leader of the House following my Business Question
[AC/IDC1226].
With thanks,
Adrian Ramsay
Drax internal emails and FCA investigation: cross-party request to review subsidy
-
The Rt Hon Ed Miliband MP
Secretary of State Department of Energy Security and Net Zero
18th February 2026
Drax internal emails and FCA investigation: cross-party request to review subsidy
Dear Secretary of State,
We are writing to bring your attention to a tranche of newly released internal correspondence from energy company Drax. This evidence suggests that Drax may have knowingly made misleading claims to the government, parliamentarians, Ofgem, and investors in its response to BBC Panorama’s investigation into Drax’s subsidised sourcing of wood from Canadian forests in 2022.
We are deeply concerned that a company should be in receipt of substantial billpayer subsidy, currently guaranteed until 2031, While it may have knowingly and consistently concealed information of material relevance to its legitimacy as a subsidy recipient.
According to media reports cited below, after the documentary aired, one senior manager wrote “we’ve been saying we don’t source from these forests when it appears we might be.”
This was despite public statements from the CEO stating that the BBC allegations were “false,” “ill-informed” and “promoted by vested interests.” The emails further Suggest Drax was told by lawyers “the legal view contradicts what you’ve put in the public domain.”
Given that the Financial Conduct Authority are currently investigating such “historical statements” made by Drax about their sourcing of pellets, we request that all future UK government contracts with Drax be suspended for the duration of this investigation. We ask you to clarify whether your Department considers Drax to be currently meeting the standards of transparency and compliance expected of a recipient of public subsidy.
We also highlight the quote from Lord Alan Whitehead, Energy Minister on 10th December 2025 “If Drax is non-compliant, the subsidy goes. There is no subsidy in the case of a non-
compliant organisation of any kind. If that happens, it will be the end of Drax”. We therefore
ask what steps you will take to reassess Drax’s eligibility for ongoing and future support
should the FCA investigation substantiate concerns that material information was withheld or
misrepresented.
Recent revelations are covered in the following media reports:
• Rachel Millard, Financial Times, Drax manager questioned public statements on
wood sourcing, tribunal documents show, 30th January 2026
• Jillian Ambrose, The Guardian, Drax insiders privately raised concerns over its
sustainability claims, court papers show, 4th February 2026
• Old Sparky, Private Eye, “Drax: Internal Affairs” Issue 1668, 6-19 Feb 2026
We hope that you share our concern and confirm that you will take decisive action to ensure
that no further subsidy will be awarded if such practice is uncovered.
Yours sincerely,
Adrian Ramsay MP
Alex Sobel MP*
Baroness Boycott
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb
Baroness Young of Old Scone
Barry Gardiner MP
Carla Denyer MP
Chris Hinchliff MP
Ellie Chowns MP
Pippa Heylings MP
Lord Randall of Uxbridge
Sian Berry MP
The Earl of Caithness
Wera Hobhouse MP
Government time to debate national security assessment on biodiversity loss, ecosystemcollapse and national security.
-
The Rt. Hon. Emma Reynolds MP
Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.
Dear Emma,
3 February 2026
Government time to debate national security assessment on biodiversity loss, ecosystem
collapse and national security.
I was pleased to be copied into the Leader of the House of Commons’ letter of 27 January 2026
[AC/IDC1226] drawing your attention to my Business Question about the Government’s recently
published national security assessment, and in particular its stark warning that global
biodiversity loss and ecosystem collapse pose a serious threat to the United Kingdom’s security
and prosperity.
I should be grateful for an update on when we will get the opportunity in Government time to
debate the nature and climate emergency being treated as a major national security priority and
what steps the Government is taking in response to the stark issues raised in the report.
With thanks,
Adrian Ramsay MP
Green MP demands tougher powers for environmental watchdog after damning OEP report.
13th of January 2026
Green MP demands tougher powers for environmental watchdog after damning OEP report.
Adrian Ramsay, MP for Waveney Valley and DEFRA lead for the Green MPs, said:
"Today’s Office for Environmental Protection (OEP) report lays bare the scale of the crisis and is a deeply damning indictment of the environmental record of successive governments. The report shows that the majority of the ten environmental targets set out in the Environment Act 2021 have little to no chance of being met by 2030.
"Rather than stepping up action, the Government is actively advancing policies that will further damage it, leaving little realistic chance of stopping the decline of iconic British species such as the hedgehog and red squirrel by 2030. The Government must recognise that halting and reversing the decline of nature is central to our wellbeing and to food security as well as a healthy environment.
"If the Government is serious about its climate and biodiversity commitments, it must give the OEP real teeth, including the power to sanction and fine Government departments and local authorities that fail to meet legally binding targets. This would not be an overreach. It would simply restore the level of environmental accountability that existed before Brexit. Without these powers, the OEP risks becoming a watchdog that can bark but cannot bite, while environmental targets remain unmet and nature continues to decline."
Letter to the Prime Minister Ahead of COP30
-
Adrian Ramsay MP co-signed this letter along with Sian Berry MP, Carla Denyer MP and Dr Ellie Chowns MP.
Rt Hon Sir Keir Starmer MP
Prime Minister
10 Downing Street
London
SW1A 2AA
31 October 2025
Dear Prime Minister,
We are writing ahead of COP30 to urge that you use the UK’s influence to ensure an ambitious outcome consistent with avoiding the most catastrophic climate impacts. This year’s COP summit is taking place at a pivotal moment in history - just past the mid-point in what’s a critical decade for climate and nature action.
The state of nature, biodiversity and ecosystems are deteriorating more rapidly than ever, and global temperatures continue to climb at a terrifyingly dangerous rate. The combined effect is devastating for the life support systems on which we all depend, and therefore also for our security, for our economic, social and political stability, and for everything from our food supplies to our health and wellbeing.
The UN Secretary General has called the fossil fuel companies the godfathers of climate chaos and the IPCC warn that emissions from fossil fuels are the dominant cause of global warming. Yet COP30 is taking place against a backdrop of continued financial support from governments for the fossil fuel industry – including an estimated £17.5 billion every year here in the UK.
At the same time, the poorest peoples of the world, with the least historic responsibility for climate emissions, continue to bear the brunt of climate breakdown. It is vital that the decisions made at COP30 do not further perpetuate climate injustice.
And with this year marking the start of a new round of Nationally Determined Contributions, COP30 is critical to closing the 1.5°C delivery gap and other gaps – as the UN Secretary General said in his remarks of 27th October 2025:
We need Nationally Determined Contributions that cut emissions much more deeply and accelerate the transition from fossil fuels to renewables. At COP30 in Brazil, we must go further and faster to close the ambition gap. We need more ambition in adaptation, mitigation and climate financial justice.
We warmly welcome your attendance at COP30 and hope your leadership will include advocating for:
A Climate Damages Tax – a “polluters pay” tax on the extraction of fossil fuels in the world’s richest advanced economies.
The Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty – a framework to manage the global transition to safe, renewable & affordable energy for all.
Climate Justice – a climate finance package made up primarily of public funded grants funds, accompanied by debt cancellation measures, and that enables countries in the Global South to reduce their emissions, adapt to the impacts of climate change and meet the costs associated with loss and damage.
A global Just Transition - negotiators must stop blocking progress towards a Belém Action Mechanism (BAM).
An action plan to end forest destruction by 2030 - voluntary initiatives have failed to halt and reverse deforestation or to stop forest degradation, and substantive, structural change is needed to ensure existing forest commitments are met in an efficient, just and equitable way.
The UK’s global leadership should also be matched with ambitious domestic action as evidence of leading by example.
So we also call on you to back national measures that are aligned with the priorities of a successful COP30, and signal to the rest of the world that the UK is prepared to do its fair share in closing the gap between what the climate science demands and current emissions projections. Specifically, we urge you to:
End handouts to fossil fuel companies - use the forthcoming Budget to stop tax reliefs, investment allowances and subsidies, and to close loopholes in the ban on UK overseas finance supporting fossil fuels.
Play fair on climate finance – this must not come at the expense of overseas development aid, must be new government money, must not increase debt burdens, and must reflect the UK’s historic responsibilities.
Back the Energy Jobs Bill - to invest in British jobs and a just transition for workers in the oil and gas sector.
Deliver climate justice at home – with policies that ensure the poorest in our communities do not bear the financial brunt of climate action.
Keep your promise on no new oil and gas – by rejecting Rosebank, Jackdaw, other new extraction proposals and all new use of tie-backs – and go even further by refusing development consent for oil and gas projects that have already been licensed.
Step up on climate adaptation – with a national climate resilience plan and a sixth Government mission on adaptation that reflects the CCC’s advice of 15th October 2025.
Whilst we recognise that the UK and the world are making significant strides towards a carbon free economy, this is still accompanied by plans to produce more than double the quantity of fossil fuels in 2030 than would be consistent with holding global temperature rises to 1.5C above preindustrial levels.
This collective failure is driving climate breakdown.
COP 30 is an opportunity to change course – to choose transformative action that tackles injustice and inequality alongside greenhouse gas emissions.
We trust you will recognise this decisive moment by ramping up your ambition still further, in order to help secure a liveable future for all.
Yours sincerely,
Adrian Ramsay MP co-signed this letter along with Sian Berry MP, Carla Denyer MP and Dr Ellie Chowns MP.
Adrian Ramsay MP Welcomes Swift Brick Pledge and Calls for Greener, Nature-Friendly Housing Standards
7th August 2025
Adrian Ramsay MP, Co-Leader of the Green Party of England and Wales and Member of Parliament for Waveney Valley, has welcomed Saffron Housing Trust’s new commitment to install swift bricks in all suitable new build homes on their future developments – calling the move “A great example of what should become the norm, not the exception.”
Saffron Housing announced that they have made this decision following representations from Adrian Ramsay on behalf of his constituents.
Speaking on the commitment Adrian Ramsay MP said
“With swifts now on the UK’s Red List, we urgently need to protect and restore their nesting sites. That is why I welcome Saffron Housing Trust's commitment to install swift bricks in all suitable new build homes on their future developments. Swift bricks are a simple, low-cost solution that offer real benefits to these birds and many other species.
“We need to make nature-friendly design and high environmental standards the norm in all new developments. We must build homes that are fit for the future – that means measures that are good for wildlife, and also measures that are good for people and reducing bills such as including renewable energy and high insulation standards as a matter of course. I commend Saffron Housing Trust for taking this step and I want to see all housing providers ensuring the highest environmental standards.”
Marie Baynham-Davies - A member of Halesworth Swifts and Suffolk Save Our Swifts who highlighted the issue with Adrian in a constituency surgery, said
“This is a real boost for swift populations which have declined by 66% since 1995. Insulation in modern developments means buildings provide no natural nest sites for birds. Swift bricks provide a safe cavity for swifts to nest in and cost less than a nest box but last the lifetime of the building. It is fantastic that Adrian Ramsay is supporting the use of Swift bricks, and we hope that Saffron Housing's decision to install them shows that putting bricks in new developments is an achievable target for all planners and developers.”
ENDS
For more information, visit https://www.actionforswifts.com and https://hannahbournetaylor.com/the-feather-speech-campaign-for-swifts/
Saffron Housing announcement https://www.linkedin.com/posts/saffron-housing-trust-limited_socialhousing-developments-environmental-activity-7358888552119615489-G4h2?utm_source=social_share_send&utm_medium=member_desktop_web&rcm=ACoAACXkKVkBzhFvdiHzxiiRBBCGJvHQaqgifLM
Adrian Ramsay MP, calls on the Prime Minister to put climate resilience on a statutory footing
14 of July 2025
Adrian Ramsay MP, calls on the Prime Minister to put climate resilience on a statutory footing, saying, "England is facing its driest start to a year in my lifetime. Extreme weather is becoming the norm, and we are nowhere near prepared to protect our citizens."
Adrian Ramsay MP, Co-Leader of the Green Party of England and Wales reacting to the Met Office’s State of the Climate Report, published today, which spells out how extreme weather events are increasing. The last three years have been among the top five warmest on record. Extremes are becoming the norm.
Adrian Ramsay MP said:
“Our climate is fuelling extreme weather, and that is having direct and urgent consequences in the here and now. The last three years have been among the top five warmest on record. Extremes are becoming the norm.
He continued ”We had the warmest spring on record, and we are in the middle of this summer’s third heatwave. The Government has not adequately prepared our infrastructure to protect our citizens."
”The Government must outline the steps they are taking to prepare for the increasing threat of extreme temperature. This is not just about this summer, it’s about how we adapt as the climate crisis continues to escalate.”
“We need to safeguard the public from this rising climate threat. That is why the Prime Minister must put climate resilience on a statutory footing, requiring local councils and major infrastructure providers to carry out climate risk assessments for all projects.”
Letter to Commons Leader requesting time to ratify the Global Oceans Treaty
-
Dear Leader of the House of Commons,
We are writing to you as cross-party members of the All-Party Parliamentary Group on the
Environment to ask you to find parliamentary time to ratify the Global Oceans Treaty. Taking this
action is critical to maintaining the UK’s global leadership on international biodiversity and protecting
the oceans beloved by the British public.
The Global Oceans Treaty - also known as the Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdictions agreement -
is crucial to establishing marine protected areas in parts of the ocean that lie beyond national
maritime borders. Whilst the treaty was agreed in 2023, it must be formally ratified by each
participating nation, which in the UK requires primary legislation. 28 states have now formally
ratified the agreement, including France, Spain and Portugal. If the UK fails to ratify quickly it will risk
losing its seat at the table for ongoing international negotiations.
Governments had aimed to ratify the treaty by this month’s UN Ocean Conference, to ensure it
enters into force quickly enough to protect 30% of oceans by 2030. This is a core goal of the Global
Ocean Alliance, a 77-country group led by the UK.
The treaty is within the remit of the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, who have
continually expressed their support for ratifying it. However, time must now urgently be found in the
Commons for this business to take place.
The ocean produces at least 50% of the planet’s oxygen, is home to most of earth’s biodiversity, and
globally more than 40 million people will be employed by ocean-based industries by 2030. Yet
society is taking more from the ocean than can be replenished, with 90% of big fish populations
depleted and 50% of coral reefs destroyed.
International waters that will be protected by the Global Oceans are vulnerable to exploitation,
including from industrial fishing and oil drilling. Currently, less than 1% of the high seas – which
comprises almost two-thirds of the world’s ocean – is fully or highly protected from human activities.
As an issue supported by politicians from all major parties, where lack of actions risks damaging the
UK’s international reputation for marine conservation, we hope you can find time for this important
piece of parliamentary business.
Yours sincerely,
Cuts to ELMS - and impact on NFM projects in constituency
-
19 May 2025
Dear Minister Zeichner,
Earlier this month, I met with many farmers in my constituency, all of whom were extremely concerned about
the abrupt removal of the Sustainable Farming Incentive (SFI) to new entrants. Despite the recent
announcement of the scheme’s return – which no doubt offered some hope to those committed to its principles
– questions remain, and damage has already been done. For farmers to plan effectively and have confidence
in the scheme’s future, clarity and consistency are essential.
Farmers whose applications were arbitrarily rejected due to the sudden cessation of the scheme’s application
process – and those unable to guarantee eligibility criteria – now face renewed uncertainty. This is especially
damaging given that farmers must plan crops and land use years in advance. Decisions made in previous
seasons – often based on assumptions of continued support – determine what is possible now. They cannot
simply react to abrupt subsidy changes. Financial support must enable and reward long-term planning, not
undermine it. The fact that the NFU was only informed of the scheme’s withdrawal half an hour in advance
(42 days short of the promised notice period) reinforces the impression that decision-makers fail to understand
the economic pressures and instability facing many in our farming community. Farmers must be able to plan
their financial future with greater certainty, and access to public funding must be fair and transparent.
The SFI scheme is not perfect. However, it offered a meaningful replacement for the EU’s CAP payments and
pointed to a future in which farmers could invest in the natural capital of their land. It allowed time, labour and
money to be directed toward restoring hedgerows, improving water quality, reducing flood risk, and providing
vital wildlife habitats – all through natural solutions. The Government stated that record numbers of farmers
had enrolled for the final round. This demand should be lauded as a sign of a new era of nature-friendly
farming, repairing the environmental harm caused by decades of industrial, intensive practices.
In one of the most nature-depleted countries in the world, this work is essential to reversing catastrophic
biodiversity decline. Without this incentive, farmers tell me they will be forced to maximise productive land
just to preserve modest gains. That might even include uprooting hedgerows or ploughing parcels of land
previously returned to nature under earlier schemes.
Last week’s statement pledging a replacement scheme offers little reassurance, with key decisions about its
scope and scale left until after the Chancellor’s Spending Review. This raises serious concerns that the
scheme’s future will be shaped by short-term Treasury pressures rather than the long-term needs of farming,
climate adaptation, food security and nature recovery.
I put to you some important questions. Will you confirm when the new eligibility criteria will be published?
What steps are you taking to prioritise farmers affected by the abrupt closure? What reassurance can you give
to those already in the SFI that they will be able to reapply in good time for future phases? And finally, can
you guarantee that the full £2.4 billion annual farming budget will be protected through and beyond the
Spending Review, so that Environmental Land Management schemes deliver on their promises for nature,
food security, and rural livelihoods?
I look forward to your response.
Cross Party Letter re Nature Protection
-
Dear Angela,
We are writing in response to the Government’s recent impact assessment of the Planning and Infrastructure Bill, which finds that there is almost no evidence that existing environmental protections have significantly impeded development. This directly undermines the core justification Ministers have used to weaken safeguards for nature— namely, that they hinder house building and infrastructure delivery.
The publication of this impact assessment confirms what many of us across parties have long argued: the notion that nature and development are in fundamental conflict is reductive, misleading, and unhelpful.
The framing of housing versus nature is a false choice, and one that distracts from the pressing issues we must address to achieve sustainable and affordable development. We believe it is not only possible but essential to deliver the affordable homes and national infrastructure people need in a way that works with nature, not against it. Our planning system should support thriving ecosystems, climate resilience, and access to green space—not treat them as secondary concerns to be compromised.
The Government’s own analysis makes it clear that the current version of the Planning and Infrastructure Bill fails to meet this test. This concern is echoed by the Office for Environmental Protection, whose legal opinion warns that the Bill in its current form would remove critical safeguards for nature and put protected sites at risk.
Together, these assessments highlight the danger of entrenching short-term thinking at the expense of long-term social, environmental, and economic resilience. Those dangers are particularly apparent this spring—confirmed by the Environment Agency as the driest start to the season since 1956—with rivers running dry and farmers expressing concern about how they will keep crops watered. We cannot afford to ride roughshod over the increasingly fragile natural world we all depend on.
We urge you to champion a more constructive approach—one that aligns ambition for house building and infrastructure with a genuine commitment to nature protection. In this Bill, you have a powerful opportunity to set a different direction and show that strong environmental standards are not a barrier to progress, but a foundation for it.
We would welcome the chance to meet and discuss how we might work across parties to secure a planning system that delivers for both people and nature.
Dear Angela,
We are writing in response to the Government’s recent impact assessment of the Planning and Infrastructure Bill, which finds that there is almost no evidence that existing environmental protections have significantly impeded development. This directly undermines the core justification Ministers have used to weaken safeguards for nature— namely, that they hinder house building and infrastructure delivery.
The publication of this impact assessment confirms what many of us across parties have long argued: the notion that nature and development are in fundamental conflict is reductive, misleading, and unhelpful.
The framing of housing versus nature is a false choice, and one that distracts from the pressing issues we must address to achieve sustainable and affordable development. We believe it is not only possible but essential to deliver the affordable homes and national infrastructure people need in a way that works with nature, not against it. Our planning system should support thriving ecosystems, climate resilience, and access to green space—not treat them as secondary concerns to be compromised.
The Government’s own analysis makes it clear that the current version of the Planning and Infrastructure Bill fails to meet this test. This concern is echoed by the Office for Environmental Protection, whose legal opinion warns that the Bill in its current form would remove critical safeguards for nature and put protected sites at risk.
Together, these assessments highlight the danger of entrenching short-term thinking at the expense of long-term social, environmental, and economic resilience. Those dangers are particularly apparent this spring—confirmed by the Environment Agency as the driest start to the season since 1956—with rivers running dry and farmers expressing concern about how they will keep crops watered. We cannot afford to ride roughshod over the increasingly fragile natural world we all depend on.
We urge you to champion a more constructive approach—one that aligns ambition for house building and infrastructure with a genuine commitment to nature protection. In this Bill, you have a powerful opportunity to set a different direction and show that strong environmental standards are not a barrier to progress, but a foundation for it.
We would welcome the chance to meet and discuss how we might work across parties to secure a planning system that delivers for both people and nature.
Adrian Ramsay MP co-signed this cross-party letter initiated by Dr Ellie Chowns MP.
"We are woefully unprepared for the impacts of climate breakdown"
30 April 2025.
Adrian Ramsay, MP for Waveney Valley and Co-leader of the Green Party of England and Wales said "We are woefully unprepared for the impacts of climate breakdown"
Reacting to the Climate Change Committee Adaptation Progress Report Adrian Ramsay MP said;
The Climate Change Committee report could not be clearer: We are woefully unprepared for the impacts of climate breakdown as a country.
I urge the Government to fully implement the Climate Change Committee’s recommendations and produce a comprehensive plan to prepare for increasingly extreme weather events.
I've called on the Chancellor to ensure that the spending review allows for an additional £7 billion per year in climate adaptation and resilience funding. This investment is critical to protecting vital public infrastructure and ensuring that essential services like transport, energy, and healthcare can continue to function as climate impacts intensify.
The CCC highlights that over half of England’s top-quality agricultural land is already at risk of flooding, jeopardising our food security. Meanwhile, a third of our railways are at risk from flooding and extreme heat; without serious investment, we risk widespread disruption and failure of services that people rely on daily. The Government must act now to future-proof the UK’s infrastructure and protect communities from the worsening impacts of the climate crisis.
Alongside decarbonising our economy to meet net-zero goals, the Government is responsible for protecting our communities from climate impacts. That means acting now.
Green MP urges Government funding for trailblazing flood management project
12 March 2025
Adrian Ramsay, Green MP for Waveney Valley and Green Party Co-Leader, has called a flood management project in his constituency a national trailblazer and urged the Government to maintain its support for the Waveney and Little Ouse Recovery project, in order to protect nature and alleviate the risk of flooding in towns in his constituency.
Adrian Ramsay has written to the Minister of State at the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), Daniel Zeichner, following a visit by the minister to the area earlier this year. The Waveney Valley MP said Defra support was vital to the success of the project which is run by Suffolk Wildlife Trust working with the Environment Agency, local farmers and landowners.
Defra’s support for the initial phase of the project, funded through the Landscape Recovery pilot programme, had enabled the Trust and its partners to build a financial model to pay for the delivery of nature-based solutions to the challenges brought about by climate change.
Adrian Ramsay said the cost-benefits of the Waveney and Little Ouse Recovery Project were clear and had huge potential to avert flooding in vulnerable local communities - a growing problem locally.
He said: “The project has the capacity to protect the market towns of Diss and Bungay in my constituency as well as nearby towns such as Beccles and Thetford which are also vulnerable to flooding. The financial savings would be substantial, not to mention the benefit to local residents whose homes were kept safe from flooding.”
He said the project also provided an important template for how private investors could help the UK achieve its net zero and nature recovery targets by supplementing public funding for environmental delivery.
The project is reaching the end of its development phase and Suffolk Wildlife Trust wants an extension of Defra’s support to cover upfront investment and ongoing maintenance costs. It is seeking private investment to match any funds from Defra and hopes that the income from the sale of ecosystem services will pay for the project in the long term.
Ramsay added: “I hope that Defra will support this and other nature recovery projects by providing adequate funding. I know this project offers good value for money and will also provide many additional benefits for nature restoration and tackling climate change.”
Support for the Landscape Recovery project on the Waveney and Little Ouse
-
Daniel Zeichner MP
Minister for Food Security and Rural Affairs
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Seacole Building
2 Marsham Street
London
SW1P 4DFOur Ref: AR01549
26 February 2025
Dear Minister,
Re: Support for the Landscape Recovery project on the Waveney and Little Ouse
Following a visit to the Waveney and Little Ouse Recovery Project in my Waveney Valley constituency, I am writing to express my support of the project. I understand that you have also met with Suffolk Wildlife in the project area and heard from them directly about the great potential of the approach they are taking here. I hope you will agree it is vital Defra maintains its support for this and similar projects that offer the innovative solutions we need in the face of the societal challenges of climate change and the nature crisis. I know that Suffolk Wildlife Trust would be happy to host future visits by Defra Ministers as they look to secure Defra’s commitment to take the project forward, and I would be very pleased to help facilitate in any way I can.
Through the Waveney and Little Ouse Recovery project, Suffolk Wildlife Trust is working with the Environment Agency and local farmers and landowners in the catchment of the Waveney and Little Ouse headwaters to develop a sustainable financial model to pay for the delivery of vital Nature Based Solutions to the challenges of climate change and biodiversity loss.
By restoring biodiversity, ecological connectivity, and resilient ecosystems at a landscape scale, the project would deliver a range of benefits to local communities and businesses, as well as contributing to wider net zero and nature recovery ambitions. Defra’s support for the initial phase of the project, funded through the Landscape Recovery pilot programme, has enabled Suffolk Wildlife Trust and their project partners to take a rigorous evidence-based approach to quantifying and valuing these societal benefits in the form of ecosystem services that can be marketed and sold to fund their delivery.
The Waveney and Little Ouse Recovery Project has capacity to protect the market towns of Diss and Bungay in the Waveney Valley constituency as well as larger nearby towns such as Beccles and Thetford which are also vulnerable to flooding. The financial cost savings would be substantial as would be the benefit to local residents whose homes were kept safe from flooding.
As the MP for Waveney Valley, I wish to support the scheme and the benefits this project could provide to local people, businesses, and the environment in my constituency; but I also recognise its wider potential as a template for how private investors can help the UK to achieve its net zero and nature recovery targets and mitigate the future costs of climate change and biodiversity loss by supplementing public funding for environmental delivery.
Suffolk Wildlife Trust estimates the project’s proposed habitat and ecosystem restoration, and land-use change could deliver:266,803 tonnes of CO2 removed from the atmosphere over 50 years
More than 5,000 Biodiversity Units[1]
9,969kg reduction in phosphorous inputs to land
450,948m3 additional flood water storage capacity
204,286m3 reduction in water run-off into local rivers
The project will soon be reaching the end of its development phase and seeking an extension of Defra’s support to enable it to move into the delivery phase. While the expectation is that income from the sale of ecosystem services will pay for delivery in the long-term, there is a need for upfront investment to cover the capital and ongoing maintenance costs of restoration and land-use change while the market for ecosystem services matures, and to set up the legal business structures needed to bring these ecosystem services to market. In order for this and other landscape recovery schemes to have the positive impacts that they should, it is necessary to provide clarity and reassurance to businesses and landowners who might wish to participate in such a project. Landowners need a guarantee of consistent future payments and businesses need to understand what future sustainability requirements are going to be. Furthermore, licenses and permits need to fit the scale of the landscape change instead of being suitable only for individual sites and small projects.
Suffolk Wildlife Trust have explained that private investment is being sought to match any investment by Defra, and that future income from sale of the ecosystem services would be used to defray the investment in ongoing maintenance costs – providing added value for money to the public purse and a return on Defra’s initial investment that would demonstrate the value of Landscape Recovery.
The Landscape Recovery Scheme has the potential to reverse biodiversity declines, support net zero, improve the health of rivers, protect people’s homes and businesses from flooding, and increase the availability of nature and its many benefits for people. Consequently, this and similar projects can help the Government deliver on its commitments in those areas.
I would only add, and am sure you agree, that fantastic nature recovery and carbon sequestration projects like this must be in addition to and not instead of the wider drive away from fossil fuels and to decarbonise the energy system and wider economy.
I am impressed by the Waveney and Little Ouse Recovery Project and consider that there is a need for similar schemes across the country. Similar projects should restore and enhance our natural environment, helping to mitigate the impacts of our changing climate and to adapt to it.
I hope that DEFRA will support this and other nature recovery projects by providing adequate funding, including to cover the setting up of the scheme. I am certain that the project offers good value for money and will also provide many additional benefits and would be grateful if you could confirm Defra’s intention to provide the next phase of funding requested by the project.
Yours,
Adrian Ramsay MP
Member of Parliament for Waveney Valley[1] Measured using Defra Biodiversity Metric v.3.1
The 7th Carbon Budget sets out a pathway to save our economy. Now, the Government must step up to show the ambition and leadership this moment demands.
26th of February 2025
Adrian Ramsay MP, Co-Leader of the Green Party, calls on the Government to ensure ambitious climate action isn’t delayed any further – and for polluters to pay the highest price, not the poorest in our communities.
Adrian Ramsay MP said: “Today’s 7th Carbon Budget advice from the Climate Change Committee (CCC) makes clear that a climate safe future is still within our grasp – and that the cost of not reducing climate emissions will be far higher for our economy than the cost of investment net zero. Crucially, we need to see the Government make investment choices that result in households benefiting financially from climate action too – both by ensuring everyone can access renewables and energy efficiency and because they are paying lower bills. The public are clear that they want to see the worst climate polluters pay, and we need to make sure that the costs of climate action never fall on those least able to afford it.
“A thriving green economy is also vital if we are to prevent climate deniers, like Reform, from weaponising the mass destruction of climate chaos. Instead, we must help the most vulnerable and build resilience in communities to adapt to climate breakdown. ”
He continued: “Without an immediate acceleration of climate ambition, our economy, national security and environment are all at serious risk. That’s why we are disappointed not to see the CCC go even further on measures to reduce energy demand. In the face of impending airport expansion decisions by this Labour government, more ambitious policy is urgently needed to keep the aviation sector in check. Their advice shows strong public support for limiting airport expansion and introducing a frequent flier levy where the small percentage of the population who take the vast majority of the flights have to pay more .
“The CCC have shown that a positive, fairer, jobs-rich, greener future is possible, and they have set a clear pathway forthe Government to follow. Now, we need the Government to step up, stop the vested interests who are intent on delaying, and show the ambition and leadership this moment demands.”
Farming, Nature & Flood Control
5th of January 2025
There have been so many mis-steps by this Labour government in its first few months in office that it’s hard to know where to start. But the latest came in last month’s budget over its approach to farms.
The issue that’s grabbed most of the headlines is the change in inheritance tax rules which could impact family-owned farms which want to pass on the farm to the next generation. The Government needs to find a way to differentiate family farms from large estates bought to avoid tax and reconsider the £1 million threshold. Many family farms are worth much more than that, even though the farmer’s income is often very low.
What’s had less attention is the worrying freeze in the subsidy paid to farmers to encourage biodiversity on their land, amounting to a real-terms cut. This will make it much harder to achieve the switch to nature-friendly farming which is so vital to reverse the decline in wildlife, clean up our rivers and make farming more resilient to climate change.
The Government has its own legally binding targets on improving nature, a recognition of the fact that we are one of the most nature-depleted countries in the world. Yet when it comes to the crunch, the budget for achieving that is going down in real terms.
It is not only deeply short-sighted. It shows ministers just don’t understand the severity of the climate and nature crises. Both will have, and are already having, a major impact on the food we grow and our food security.
Let’s take the nature crisis first. Anyone who’s been walking or driving through the countryside over the years will have noticed the drastic decline in insect life. Insect numbers are down almost 60 percent in the past 20 years so we’re seeing fewer moths, flies, bees and butterflies. All of these are important pollinators for crops as well as our gardens.
Then there’s the state of our rivers. Only 14 percent of rivers in England are in good ecological health, none of them are in good overall health. This is partly down to water companies dumping sewage in the rivers. But, especially in areas like Waveney Valley, it is also a result of agricultural run-off from fertilisers or animal waste.
The chemicals from fertilisers and waste from slurry create algal blooms, disrupting ecosystems in the water and leading to “dead zones” for animals and plants, effectively killing the river.
The Government is reviewing the way water companies are regulated to try to curb their pollution of waterways and this is welcome and long overdue. But the review is largely ignoring waste from farms which accounts for 40 percent of water pollution, according to Defra. All the more reason for the Government to increase the funding available for nature-friendly farming to the levels the nature charities are saying is needed.
The health of our rivers is vital both to nature and our own health and wellbeing. It needs to be made a priority.
I had the chance to visit a couple of our local rivers recently, in the company of the Little Ouse Headwaters Project and the River Waveney Trust, both brilliant charities which are working to improve the health of the rivers and see how they can be better managed for the benefit of wildlife, people and the climate.
That brings us to the climate crisis. The last 18 months have been the wettest since records began in 1836 – a pattern which is likely to become the new normal with climate change. Although England has escaped the devastating floods which have hit Spain and other parts of Europe this autumn, many local communities have been affected by flooding in the last year and the frequency and severity is only likely to grow.
So flood management, especially in an area like East Anglia, has never been more important.
Gone are the days when engineers sought to channel rainfall as fast as possible into rivers. That just led to the rivers becoming overwhelmed and flooding areas further downstream.
The aim now is to hold back the water, using natural techniques like installing “leaky” dams to release water slowly, planting trees, digging ponds to store floodwater and protecting floodplains.
In Gissing, the River Waveney Trust and Norfolk Rivers Trust worked with the local community, landowners and the parish council to create a natural flood management scheme to make the land more flood resilient. They deployed low-cost solutions such as leaky dams, tree planting and using an adjacent meadow to temporarily store water so that heavy rainfall wouldn’t rush into the river and overwhelm it.
Eight named storms later, including Storm Babet in October last year, and no homes have been flooded in Gissing showing that natural flood management works.
The Little Ouse Headwaters Project is working to create a continuous corridor of wildlife habitat along the headwaters of the river, including restoring natural river features, all with flood management in mind.
Both are great projects but run on a shoestring, often with a large reliance on volunteers. Funding is always a challenge, making it difficult to scale up the work they’re doing which is vital if we’re to successfully manage flood risk and let nature recover.
I will continue to press the Government to invest properly in the nature-based solutions that are needed to support farming, restore biodiversity, capture carbon and manage floods.
Call it a reset, call it a “plan for change”, the Prime Minister’s administration was in desperate need of a relaunch
6th of December 2025
Call it a reset, call it a “plan for change”, the Prime Minister’s administration was in desperate need of a relaunch. Labour have had a shaky first few months, peppered with mis-steps from the ending of the winter fuel allowance to a budget which penalises small businesses and employers and won’t deliver improved living standards for people.
So now we have the Government’s new priorities from housing to NHS waiting lists to early years education. The ambition for Britain to be a clean energy superpower squeezes on to the list but, disappointingly, the ambition has been weakened to 95% clean power by 2030 – the same target set by the previous Conservative government.
What’s more disappointing is the silence on how we should be adapting to the impacts of climate breakdown which are affecting our communities now.
Even if we manage to limit global heating to 1.5C, and that looks more and more unlikely as emissions continue to grow and global efforts to decarbonise falter, significant changes to the climate and our weather systems are baked in. That means the UK faces more frequent severe flooding and more summer heatwaves.
We were all shocked this autumn by the images from Spain as the Valencia region was hit by devastating floods which destroyed homes, bridges, roads and cost hundreds of lives. The cost to the Spanish economy is huge. The Valencia region has asked for over 30 billion Euros in relief and the insurance costs are expected to run to several billion more.
Are we so confident that similar catastrophic flooding couldn’t happen here in the UK? The storms which hit parts of England and Wales this autumn were nothing like as severe as those in Spain yet they still led to hundreds of homes in the Midlands and South being flooded, exposing the total inadequacy of our flood defences. More than half the population say they’re not equipped to deal with flooding and the damage it would cause to their home.
The need to adapt to a different, more unstable climate shouldn’t come as a surprise to Government. Its own advisers, the Climate Change Committee, issued a review of the National Adaptation Programme earlier this year and it was scathing.
The UK is falling far short of what’s needed. The adaptation plans lack the pace and ambition to address the climate risks which are happening now. Fewer than half of the short-term actions needed to address the most urgent risks are in progress. There is no vision and the current approach isn’t working.
So while I welcome the Government’s ambition to make the UK a clean energy super-power to reduce our carbon emissions, ministers aren’t addressing the need to adapt and build up resilience now. And in some respects, we’re moving backwards.
Take the ambition for more house building. We urgently need more homes, especially more affordable homes and homes built for social rent. But building on floodplains not only condemns future owners to the misery of likely flooding, it also stops the land absorbing and holding back floodwater as nature intended.
Allowing floodplains to do their job isn’t the only nature-based solution that is being overlooked. We need to un-do the damage of previous generations and re-plant hedgerows and trees, rewind rivers and create ponds to hold back floodwaters. Nature is our ally in adapting to a changed climate: we shouldn’t ignore it.
Flooding is not the only risk to people’s livelihoods and the economy. So is extreme heat. We have already seen temperatures of above 40C in the UK which scientists say have happened only because of climate change. Our infrastructure needs to be resilient to these extreme temperatures so railways don’t buckle and people don’t bake in their homes. Retrofitting homes isn’t only about insulation to keep people warm in winter. It’s also about methods to keep them cool in summer. Over half of homes are at risk of over-heating which gives a sense of the scale of the challenge. On this, the Government has nothing to say.
Nor should we ignore the impact extreme temperatures have on our food security. The Climate Change Committee warned five years ago that more frequent weather extremes would damage crops and livestock, making food prices more volatile. Biodiversity loss could have an even greater impact, leaving crops more vulnerable to pests and pathogens.
So yes, Prime Minister, your Government needed a reset. But you’ve missed a critical mission – a national adaptation plan to safeguard our food security, better prepare the country for a future of more extreme weather and put nature at the heart of our response to climate change.
We write as cross-party parliamentarians to ask that you implement changes to the tax system to fairly tax extreme wealth to raise funds for public benefit.
-
The Rt Hon Rachel Reeves MP
Chancellor of the Exchequer
October 2024
Dear Chancellor of the Exchequer,
We write as cross-party parliamentarians to ask that you implement changes to the tax system to fairly tax extreme wealth to raise funds for public benefit.
This government has rightly acknowledged that the previous administration left the UK’s economy and public services in disarray. Austerity has plagued our constituencies and communities for over a decade, leaving vital services under-resourced and unable to adapt to emerging crises.
But there is no visible end to this crisis of underfunding. Analysis suggests that current spending plans and fiscal rules will likely lead to £18 billion of cuts to unprotected departments by 2029. In addition, through efforts to plug the financial shortfall left by the previous government, this government has already made executive decisions that place the burden of economic hardship on the most vulnerable.
We cannot afford to continue on this trajectory and, crucially, we do not need to.
In recent years, billionaire wealth has soared, increasing by almost £150 billion between 2020 and 2022. Despite this, revenue from wealth taxes has remained stagnant at around 3.4% of the UK’s GDP, proportionately only one percent higher than rates in 1965. This stands in contrast to other trends in the tax system, meaning that the richest are relatively under-taxed. This is deeply unfair and immoral: in an age of climate and economic crises, where public funds are desperately needed, it is necessary that we redress this imbalance.
The transformative potential of taxes on extreme wealth is clear, and appetite for them is growing. Governments around the world - including Norway, Italy and Brazil - are considering fiscal measures to fairly tax the super-rich. As one of the most unequal economies in the G7, the UK should follow suit.
In the upcoming Budget, we call on you to include the following changes:
Introduce an annual tax on extreme wealth. Fairly taxing extreme wealth is supported by three quarters of Britons and would generate a large stream of revenue. A wealth tax of 2% on assets over £10 million, for instance, would raise £24 billion per year.
Equalise capital gains and income tax rates. This would raise £16.7 billion per year and would rectify unfairness in the tax system, where working people are subject to proportionately higher rates of tax.
We urge you to take the bold decisions necessary to deliver the public funding that the UK desperately needs. As the first Budget of a new government, this is a key opportunity to lay the foundations for a fairer, more sustainable, and thriving economy for all.
Yours sincerely,
Adrian Co-Signed this cross-party letter initiated by Green New Deal Rising.