Urgent need for Government commitment to progress Ely and Haughley junction improvements

  • Urgent need for Government commitment to progress Ely and Haughley junction

    improvements

    Dear Secretary of State for Transport, the Rt Hon Heidi Alexander MP, and Chief Secretary to the

    Treasury, the Rt Hon Darren Jones MP

    The Government’s Plan for Change has made delivering economic growth across the UK its central mission. To achieve this, growth must be unlocked across every UK region. We are therefore writing to you to restate the six chief facts that make clear how upgrading Ely and Haughley rail junctions would directly contribute to the Government’s ambition to grow the whole of the UK.

    These schemes have been in the pipeline for decades with the case for them strengthening year on year. They are now restricting growth and the country’s progress to cleaner, greener transport connections. We are now calling on Government to commit in this Spending Review to provide Network Rail with the funds to develop the Full Business Case for the Ely Area Capacity Enhancements, so it can be delivered as soon as possible with appropriate phasing, and to provide the relatively low level of funding needed to deliver the Haughley Junction upgrade.

    The case for this investment is clear. It would:

    1. Enable businesses from Land’s End to John O’Groats: Rail freight from the Port of Felixstowe primarily serves freight terminals in the Midlands, North and Scotland, with the greatest density of goods destinations being cities in the North of England. Unlocking this bottle-neck would increase international trade flows by enabling 2,900 extra freight services to and from the Port of Felixstowe every year, also releasing capacity on rail routes serving the growing Thames ports.

    2. Unlock sustainable homes growth: It is anticipated that across the corridors which would see increased passenger services there will need to be 310,00 new homes built by 2404. People in these new communities will be the talent for the high-skilled, high-growth sectors in Cambridge, Peterborough, Norwich and Ipswich.

    3. Relieve pressure on our stretched road network: By increasing capacity and reducing bottlenecks, taking 98,000 HGVs off the road and stimulating 277,000 extra rail passenger journeys per year, it will reduce congestion by 5.6 million hours per year. Ely is also referenced in the strategies of Transport for London, Transport for the North and Midlands Connect reflecting the knock-on benefits to capacity in the wider rail and road network.

    • . Payback the investment 5-fold: The scheme has a remarkably high benefit-cost ratio, returning £4.89 of benefits for every £1 invested. An additional £60m of wider economic benefits has already been identified within the Outline Business Case. However, this does not reflect fully the growth opportunities now centred on Cambridge and Peterborough, or the Freeports.

    • Align with, and unlock, private sector investment: Hundreds of millions of pounds have already been invested by the private sector in this trade corridor, including in new port capacity, vessels, rail rolling stock and logistics facilities. Only recently £130m has been invested from private sector levies to deepen the channel at the Port of Felixstowe. Public funding for Ely helps match and capture the full value of these prior investments, whilst also unlocking more in the future including upgraded rail freight terminal facilities and new bi-mode locomotives. But it needs clear signals from Government that rail freight capacity will be released.

    • Deliver greener transport: By supporting modal shift to rail, Ely will remove the need for 98,000 HGV journeys every year, and attract substantially more rail users as evidence of increased passenger frequencies across the East has already demonstrated. It would also reduce carbon emissions by 1.7m tonnes of CO2 over 60 years.

    Delaying these projects further will delay national growth and productivity enhancements. We trust

    you will view these schemes positively as you determine the Spending Review.

    Yours sincerely

    Jess Asato MP Co-chair, East of England APPG

    Andrew Pakes MP Co-chair, East of England APPG

    Marie Goldman MP Vice Chair,East of England APPG

    Blake Stephenson MP Vice Chair,East of England APPG

    Jack Abbott MP East of England Missions Champion

    Alice Macdonald MP East of England Missions Champion

    Bayo Alaba MP East of England Business Champion

    David Burton-Sampson MP East of England Business Champion

    Adrian Ramsay MP co-signed this cross-party letter initiated by the East of England All-Party Parliamentary Group.

Previous
Previous

Drax internal emails and FCA investigation: cross-party request to review subsidy

Next
Next

Letter to the Secretary of State for the Home Department on proscription of Palestine Action