RE: Palestine Solidarity Campaign Rally 18th January 2025

  • RE: Palestine Solidarity Campaign Rally 18th January 2025

    Dear Home Secretary,

    We write concerning the above, and specifically to raise concerns about the manner of the policing and

    the apparent denial of civil liberties and freedom to protest.

    We are all cautiously relieved that a ceasefire in the Gaza Strip has been announced and is currently

    being implemented with hostages starting to return to their families and Palestinian detainees being

    released.

    The hope is that the staged ceasefire and release of hostages and prisoners continues as planned. But

    the Palestine solidarity movement remains as pertinent as ever, with Palestinians still facing daily brutal

    oppression under Israel’s decades long illegal occupation.

    The situation for Palestinians in the Gaza Strip is desperate, and the lifting of sanctions against violent

    settlers in the West Bank by Donald Trump has already fuelled further violence against Palestinians

    living there. It is clear that the injustices experienced by Palestinians continues and remains an

    important issue for many millions of UK citizens and for peoples across the world. The regular large

    scale protests taking place across the country over the last 15 months have been an important

    democratic expression of the strength of public feeling on this issue.

    These protests have been very well organised, with 24 national demonstrations each with between

    100,000 and a million people attending. They have been peaceful in nature and attended by a broad

    range of people and groups – including a prominent Jewish block at every march. Ahead of every march,

    the organisers have discussed fully with the Metropolitan Police to ensure their success.

    We are deeply troubled, however, by the obstacles put in place by the Metropolitan Police ahead of the

    18th January demonstration, as well as the policing on the day. We have spoken to the key figures in the

    forefront of the events of the day, listened to their first-hand accounts and viewed the video footage,

    and there are some significant issues of concern.

    It is very clear from the published footage that the protest organisers announced their intention to send

    a small delegation to walk towards the BBC, carrying flowers which they intended to lay there. They

    announced that if the police were to stop them proceeding to the BBC, then they would lay the flowers

    at the feet of the police instead.

    Footage clearly shows the police inviting the delegation to ‘filter through’ from Whitehall into Trafalgar

    Square, as opposed to it ‘breaching police lines’ as subsequently alleged. In this context, we fail to see

    how the questioning of two Members of Parliament, the charging of Ben Jamal of Palestine Solidarity

    Campaign and Chris Nineham of Stop the War Coalition with public order offences, and indeed the assault on Chris Nineham during his arrest, and the interviewing of others under caution, can be

    thought justified or in any way appropriate.

    There is a direct conflict in the respective positions of officers facilitating the progress of a delegation

    to lay flowers, and the allegation by the police that their lines had been forcibly breached. Clearly being

    invited to proceed is wholly inconsistent with the allegation of a forcible breach. We invite you to

    contrast the web posts and social media posts by the Metropolitan Police and the footage shared by

    the Palestine Solidarity Campaign.

    We know that you will have received many direct representations no doubt detailing the chronology

    and the discussions had before and throughout the rally as between the PSC and the Police and we will

    not repeat those details here, but we were aghast to learn that Met Commissioner Mark Rowley said

    publicly the day after the protest that ‘his force imposed unprecedented restrictions’ on a major

    Palestine solidarity rally in London on 18th January that led to 77 arrests.

    The changes to public order legislation by the last government, through both the Police, Crime,

    Sentencing and Courts Act 2022 and through the Public Order Act 2023, were rightly resisted. Civil

    society called it, ‘a staggering escalation of the Government’s clampdown on protest’. The Joint

    Committee on Human Rights rightly condemned the creation of, ‘a hostile environment for peaceful

    protestors.’ And an opposition frontbench reasoned amendment rightly declared this legislation would,

    ‘erode historic freedoms of peaceful protest’.

    The High Court in May this year upheld legal challenges brought by Liberty against the almost “unlimited

    powers of the Police” and it is regrettable that the Government is appealing that decision and is

    seemingly supporting public order measures which we opposed when in Opposition.

    The Government is rightly repealing anti-trade union legislation through the Employment Rights Bill. It

    should repeal anti-protest legislation as well. The use of public order legislation passed by the last

    Government, should be paused and subject to reconsideration by the Home Office rather than pursuing

    use of its devices.

    With regards to last weekend’s protest, we ask that you clarify whether there was any discussion

    between the Commissioner and the Home Office, or any prior or subsequent engagement or

    communication around such a significant change in policy.

    If so, could you please advise as to the origins of such a significant change and whether such an

    intention was approved in any way.

    We believe the charges should be dropped against those unjustly arrested, or unjustly charged,

    following the protest. And we ask that the Home Office commission an independent investigation into

    the policing of the protest.

    It was the former Government which fomented protest and used legislation to repress it, this

    Government must demonstrate it is delivering change.

    Yours,

    1. Diane Abbott MP

    2. Shockat Adam MP

    3. Órfhlaith Begley MP

    4. Apsana Begum MP

    5. Baroness Natalie Bennett

    6. Sian Berry MP

    7. Baroness Christine Blower

    8. Baroness Pauline Bryan

    9. Richard Burgon MP

    10. Ian Byrne MP

    11. Ellie Chowns MP

    12. Pat Cullen MP

    13. Lord Bryn Davies

    14. Carla Denyer MP

    15. Neil Duncan-Jordan MP

    16. John Finucane MP

    17. Mary Kelly Foy MP

    18. Chris Hazzard MP

    19. Lord John Hendy

    20. Dáire Hughes MP

    21. Adnan Hussain MP

    22. Imran Hussain MP

    23. Kim Johnson MP

    24. Baroness Jenny Jones

    25. Ayoub Khan MP

    26. Ben Lake MP

    27. Ian Lavery MP

    28. Chris Law MP

    29. Graham Leadbitter MP

    30. Brian Leishman MP

    31. Clive Lewis MP

    32. Andy McDonald MP

    33. Cathal Mallaghan MP

    34. Rachael Maskell MP

    35. Paul Maskey MP

    36. Abtisam Mohamed MP

    37. Iqbal Mohammed MP

    38. Grahame Morris MP

    39. Brendan O’Hara MP

    40. Simon Opher MP

    41. Kate Osborne MP

    42. Adrian Ramsay MP

    43. Bell Ribeiro-Addy MP

    44. Lord Prem Sikka

    45. Cat Smith MP

    46. Euan Stainbank MP

    47. Zarah Sultana MP

    48. Jon Trickett MP

    49. Nadia Whittome MP

    50. Steve Witherden MP

    51. Lord Tony Woodley

Previous
Previous

Combating Illegal Seafood Imports

Next
Next

Adrian Ramsay MP has welcomed the Government’s announcement on business rates, after raising the issue in Parliament last week.